Customer: Montech
Telon Technology Co., Ltd MONTECH 22F., No. 63, Zhongxiao 3rd Rd.,
Linkou Dist., New Taipei City 244, Taiwan (R.O.C.)

Gamma II 750W

Report Number: 20PS1695A
Customer ID: 123

Test Report Results

Section A: Testing Equipment

Electronic Loads

Chroma 63601-5 x2
Chroma 63600-2
63640-80-80 x10
63610-80-20

AC Sources Chroma 6530, APM SP300VAC4000W-P
Power Analyzers RS HMC8015
Oscilloscopes Picoscope 4444, Siglent SDS2104X PLUS
Sound Analyzer Bruel & Kjaer 2270 G4
Microphone Bruel & Kjaer Type 4955-A
Temperature Logger Picoscope TC-08
Tachometer UNI-T UT372
Multimeters Keysight 34465A
UPS FSP Champ Tower 3kVA, CyberPower OLS3000E 3kVA
Isolation Transformer 4kVA
Testing Methodology Cybenetics PSU Test Protocol

Section B: ETA

Voltage115V230V
Efficiency (>1450 Load Combinations)88.503%90.152%
Efficiency Graphs
Average PF (>1450 Load Combinations)0.9840.944
Standby Power Consumption0.1020W0.1274W
ErP Lot 3/6 Ready
(EU) No 617/2013 Compliance
Average Efficiency VSB75.845%75.640%

Section C: LAMBDA

Voltage115V230V
Noise Rating (>1450 Load Combinations)31.11dBA31.02dBA
Noise Graphs

Section D: Information about DUT

Model NameMontech
Serial NumberGAMMA750200500177
CommentsOCP cold 12V 38.9A δούλεε κανονικα μετα απο αυτο το σημείο μεχρι και τα 40Α που εκλεισε ειχε υψηλο Ripple >200 και δεν τραβαγε σωστα Ampere OCP hot 12V ειχε ιδια συμπεριφορα με το cold με τιμες 40.1 σωστης λειτουργίας και 42 εκλεισε
Date of receiptJul 22, 2020
Testing DateJul 3, 2020
Report Issued DateJul 29, 2020
Engineer Name0
Authorized By the Laboratory General ManagerAristeidis Bitziopoulos

Section E: Deviation Additions, deviations, and exceptions to the method table

Uncertainty

The Noise Measurement’s Uncertainty is ±1.18 dB. The reported expanded uncertainty is based on a standard uncertainty multiplied by a coverage factor k=2, providing a level of confidence of approximately 95%.

The reported noise measurement’s level is the mean of 10 repeated measurements at an environment with a temperature deviation of ±2 degrees Celsius. The uncertainty was estimated according to the method in UKAS Publication M 3003.

Uncertainty Budget
Source of uncertainty Value ± Probability distribution Divisor Standard uncertainty
Calibrator’s calibration 0.2 dB Normal 2 0.1
Calibrator’s accuracy 0.2 dB Rectangular √3 0.058
Mic Frequency Response 2 dB Rectangular √3 0.577
Temperature Variation 0.04 dB Rectangular √3 0.012
Operator’s Accuracy 0.2 dB Rectangular √3 0.058
Standard uncertainty of mean of 10 repeated readings Normal 1 0.031
Combined Standard Uncertainty Assumed normal 0.59 dB
Expanded Uncertainty Assumed normal (k = 2) 1.18 dB

*Here the (±) half-width divided by √3 is used.