Customer: Cooler Master
8F., No. 788-1, Zhongzheng Rd.,Zhonghe Dist., New Taipei City 23586, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Lodewijkstraat 1b, 5652 AC Eindhoven, Netherlands

V850 SFX Gold (2021)

Report Number: 21PS1903A
Customer ID: 27

Test Report Results

Section A: Testing Equipment

Electronic Loads

Chroma 63601-5 x2
Chroma 63600-2
63640-80-80 x10
63610-80-20

AC Sources Chroma 6530, APM SP300VAC4000W-P
Power Analyzers RS HMC8015
Oscilloscopes Picoscope 4444, Siglent SDS2104X PLUS
Sound Analyzer Bruel & Kjaer 2270 G4
Microphone Bruel & Kjaer Type 4955-A
Temperature Logger Picoscope TC-08
Tachometer UNI-T UT372
Multimeters Keysight 34465A
UPS FSP Champ Tower 3kVA, CyberPower OLS3000E 3kVA
Isolation Transformer 4kVA
Testing Methodology Cybenetics PSU Test Protocol

Section B: ETA

Voltage115V230V
Efficiency (>1450 Load Combinations)88.519%91.022%
Efficiency Graphs
Average PF (>1450 Load Combinations)0.9850.955
Standby Power Consumption0.0447W0.0824W
ErP Lot 3/6 Ready
(EU) No 617/2013 Compliance
Average Efficiency VSB78.394%78.989%

Section C: LAMBDA

Voltage115V230V
Noise Rating (>1450 Load Combinations)37.32dBA37.09dBA
Noise Graphs

Section D: Information about DUT

Model NameCooler Master
Serial NumberMPY8501SFHAGVEU1211500121
CommentsNT115V & 230V&100V CL3 κλεινει αμεσα Πολύ υψηλο ripple 115V στο Τ10 στα 3.3V T11 5V& 3.3V NT100V under voltage στα 5VSB στα T5,6,7,8,9,10 ripple100v T9->3.3V, T10, CL4->5V,3.3V
Date of receiptSep 6, 2021
Testing DateSep 14, 2021
Report Issued DateSep 10, 2021
Engineer Name0
Authorized By the Laboratory General ManagerAristeidis Bitziopoulos

Section E: Deviation Additions, deviations, and exceptions to the method table

Uncertainty

The Noise Measurement’s Uncertainty is ±1.18 dB. The reported expanded uncertainty is based on a standard uncertainty multiplied by a coverage factor k=2, providing a level of confidence of approximately 95%.

The reported noise measurement’s level is the mean of 10 repeated measurements at an environment with a temperature deviation of ±2 degrees Celsius. The uncertainty was estimated according to the method in UKAS Publication M 3003.

Uncertainty Budget
Source of uncertainty Value ± Probability distribution Divisor Standard uncertainty
Calibrator’s calibration 0.2 dB Normal 2 0.1
Calibrator’s accuracy 0.2 dB Rectangular √3 0.058
Mic Frequency Response 2 dB Rectangular √3 0.577
Temperature Variation 0.04 dB Rectangular √3 0.012
Operator’s Accuracy 0.2 dB Rectangular √3 0.058
Standard uncertainty of mean of 10 repeated readings Normal 1 0.031
Combined Standard Uncertainty Assumed normal 0.59 dB
Expanded Uncertainty Assumed normal (k = 2) 1.18 dB

*Here the (±) half-width divided by √3 is used.