Customer: be quiet!
Wilhelm-Bergner-Str. 11 c, 21509 Glinde, Germany

Straight Power 11 Platinum 550W

Report Number: 20PS1622A
Customer ID: 22

Test Report Results

Section A: Testing Equipment

Electronic Loads

Chroma 63601-5 x2
Chroma 63600-2
63640-80-80 x10
63610-80-20

AC Sources Chroma 6530, APM SP300VAC4000W-P
Power Analyzers RS HMC8015
Oscilloscopes Picoscope 4444, Siglent SDS2104X PLUS
Sound Analyzer Bruel & Kjaer 2270 G4
Microphone Bruel & Kjaer Type 4955-A
Temperature Logger Picoscope TC-08
Tachometer UNI-T UT372
Multimeters Keysight 34465A
UPS FSP Champ Tower 3kVA, CyberPower OLS3000E 3kVA
Isolation Transformer 4kVA
Testing Methodology Cybenetics PSU Test Protocol

Section B: ETA

Voltage115V230V
Efficiency (>1450 Load Combinations)90.147%92.110%
Efficiency Graphs
Average PF (>1450 Load Combinations)0.9900.966
Standby Power Consumption0.1442W0.1726W
ErP Lot 3/6 Ready
(EU) No 617/2013 Compliance
Average Efficiency VSB80.508%78.901%

Section C: LAMBDA

Voltage115V230V
Noise Rating (>1450 Load Combinations)9.18dBA10.21dBA
Noise Graphs

Section D: Information about DUT

Model Namebe quiet!
Serial Number305S9491000805
Comments-> on NT(115V) after T#8 test the PSU shut down when push stop load button on faganas -> NT (115V) T#10, #11 πάρθηκε με html στο 1' -> ΝΤ (230V) μετά το Τ#6 πάρθηκαν με θερμοκρασίες έως 29C -> OPP πάρθηκε δύο φορές, μία με 140% υπό το φόβο μη καεί και με 150% (OPPv2) -> CL(115V & 230V) πάρθηκαν με θερμοκρασίες <29C
Date of receiptMar 4, 2020
Testing DateMar 20, 2020
Report Issued DateMar 17, 2020
Engineer Name0
Authorized By the Laboratory General ManagerAristeidis Bitziopoulos

Section E: Deviation Additions, deviations, and exceptions to the method table

Uncertainty

The Noise Measurement’s Uncertainty is ±1.18 dB. The reported expanded uncertainty is based on a standard uncertainty multiplied by a coverage factor k=2, providing a level of confidence of approximately 95%.

The reported noise measurement’s level is the mean of 10 repeated measurements at an environment with a temperature deviation of ±2 degrees Celsius. The uncertainty was estimated according to the method in UKAS Publication M 3003.

Uncertainty Budget
Source of uncertainty Value ± Probability distribution Divisor Standard uncertainty
Calibrator’s calibration 0.2 dB Normal 2 0.1
Calibrator’s accuracy 0.2 dB Rectangular √3 0.058
Mic Frequency Response 2 dB Rectangular √3 0.577
Temperature Variation 0.04 dB Rectangular √3 0.012
Operator’s Accuracy 0.2 dB Rectangular √3 0.058
Standard uncertainty of mean of 10 repeated readings Normal 1 0.031
Combined Standard Uncertainty Assumed normal 0.59 dB
Expanded Uncertainty Assumed normal (k = 2) 1.18 dB

*Here the (±) half-width divided by √3 is used.